Child pages
  • ARCHIVE: Agenda 2013-04-15- GEMS Action Items
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

 Action Items

Task

Assigned To

Expected Completion Date

Completed By

Notes/Results

Explore how iu does weather aler texts and if we can incorporate into gems admission  process

eadienge

carried over

 

considered a nice to have feature but not a must have

Funding admissions. Examine workflow for each stakeholder. 

eadienge

underway

 

 

Wireframe mockup 
Wireframe Software axure and balsamiq

darkins

carried over

 

 

Email exchange office account

eadiange

complete

 

 

gather types of reports commonly requested

all stakeholders

complete

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Meeting Agenda/Notes

GEMS – April 15, 2013

  1. Stakeholder feedback 
  2. Funding discussion/creative whiteboard session
    #Caleb has done an excellent job to conceptualize the back-end architecture, he will discuss that architecture and request your feedback for additional components
    #Erick will lead the discussion regarding the user interface design needs for the funding process.

NOTES FROM MEETING
Melanie's feedback

  • Promise  (what was promised at the time of admission)
    • Track admission promise - semester by semester, promise is renewed or revised during GED. 2 or 4 year financial aid / contingencies = can be taken back
  • Job assignment - term, amount, faculty, AI/RA, evaluation, contigency, only money spent - (MUST be a flexible system) 

Summary of whiteboard notes
Whiteboard images:

  • No labels